A new interface for Tablets? Español | Deutsch | Français | Italiano | Português

I'm fairly skeptical when it comes to tablet computers, I just think windowing interfaces designed for desktop use with a mouse and a keyboard don't really cut it when all you've got is a stylus to play with...


The BumpTop™ prototype
What was needed was a innovative interface, we needed a paradigm shift, and it's possible that BumpTop (via Second Life Insider) might be it. Watch the video, it'll explain the interface a lot better than I could in words, but in summary "Why didn't I think of that..."

Of course if you took the multi-touch hardware interface from the new Apple iPhone and combined it BumpTop with a tablet form factor, and maybe you've got something. Anyone paying attention over at Apple..?

An Apple Special Event on the 20th? Español | Deutsch | Français | Italiano | Português

The first rumours of an Apple Special Event on the 20th of February are spreading fast. Most people are guessing that in the wake of the iPhone, and the curious lack of Macs and Macworld, we're looking at the official release of Leopard and maybe new versions of iLife and iWork.

But as Crunch Gear asks, the main question is "...what else are we going to see?", and I've got to agree with them, we probably aren't looking at anything as exciting as a new 12-inch Macbook Pro. But an upgraded Mac mini is probably a good bet.

Is Java the new COBOL? Español | Deutsch | Français | Italiano | Português

The lack of a Java runtime on Apple's new iPhone has raised some eyebrows. Especially since we know that Jonathan Schwartz, Sun's CEO, personally pitched Java to Steve Jobs. We also know that Steve said,

Java's not worth building in. Nobody uses Java anymore. It's this big heavyweight ball and chain...

which is an interesting statement to make about a language that was the way to do things only a few years ago. I've never personally liked Java that much, not because I think its a bad language, but because it doesn't fit well with the way I think. After a decade and a half writing Fortran and C code, and a brief couple of years writing Java, I'm at a loss to explain why anyone still writes high level software in a statically typed language. Especially one that forces you into a straight jacket about the way you build objects. I guess that's why I'm a Perl guy, although like a lot of Perl people these days I seem to be writing a lot of Javascript, and Python, and PHP if comes to that...

I'm not the only drop out of course, Jens Alfke has a theory that,

Java desktop apps succeed only in niches where UI design and usability don't matter: development tools and enterprise software. Programmers expect things to be crude and complicated... and the poor users of enterprise software don't have a choice...

which is another interesting statement about the language, obliquely making the point that Daniel Steinberg made in his recent article,

Developers are looking at Flash and at AJAX as platforms for rich desktop applications. If Java becomes irrelevant... then we will enter a new phase in it's life. There will be plenty of uses for Java for a good long while but we are entering the Fortan phase or the COBOL phase.

Of course it's going to be all that C code we wrote in the 80's and 90's that means we'll be pulled out of retirement in 2038 rather than the Java code we were writing at the turn of the millennium, but I take his point...

Single chip for GPS & Bluetooth Español | Deutsch | Français | Italiano | Português

The one thing missing from the recently announced iPhone that would change it from merely a "must have" to a "will kill for" gadget, well apart from the ability for me to develop third party applications, is GPS.

So the announcement that GPS and Bluetooth will soon be available on a single chip is somewhat reassuring. Having come this far Apple surely won't stumble at the final hurdle, will they?

The iPhone disaster? Español | Deutsch | Français | Italiano | Português

It's now confirmed that the new iPhone will be a closed platform. More of an iPod than a Mac really, which as a potential third party developer I view as a disaster. However I'm still hopeful, the phone has these widgets you see...

Andy Ihnatko of the Chicago Sun Times is one of the select few to have been hands on with the iPhone, and he's managed to confirm that while the iPhone widgets aren't exactly the same as OSX's Dashboard widgets, they do use the same technology. You can also build them using Dashcode, although presumably not the currently released version. As Andy says this really does hold out the hope that the widget layer at least will be open to third-party developers.

A touch screen 12-inch replacement? Español | Deutsch | Français | Italiano | Português

In the wake of the iPhone announcement last week rumours of a replacement for Apple's 12-inch Powerbook are once again circulating. However this time people are talking about a touch screen interface or a full blown tablet Mac.

Are they mad? I spend three quarters of my life sitting in-front of a computer, its what I do, and I'm sure I'm not the only one to scream in horror at the thought of loosing the tactile feedback from a real keyboard in exchange for a touch screen. However what they seem to be missing is the trackpad, why do we need it anymore? The multi-touch technology of the iPhone is far in advance, and much more intuitive, than any trackpad I've ever used including Apple's own scrolling version. So why not get rid of the track pad entirely and make the screen the real interface? Hang onto the keyboard, any decent typist beyond the hunt and peck stage isn't going to like it going away, but the track pad? Nobody likes track pads, or most, if any of the alternatives. No track pad, and we're that much closer to the light weight 12-inch replacement I've been hoping we'd see for a while now.

I very much doubt well see a "real" Mac tablet, other that Axiotron's Modbook, there just isn't the market yet and to be honest I don't think there ever will be, but a laptop with a touch screen interface? You can almost see it coming...

RFID tattoos? Español | Deutsch | Français | Italiano | Português

Anyone reading the blog for long enough will know I'm not a big fan of RFID, or at least not a big fan of some of the uses its being put to, the technology itself is quite interesting.

So I have to admit I'm greeting the arrival of RFID tattoos with some trepidation. The Register's Bill Ray reports (via Wireless Weblog) that Somark Innovations has,

...successfully tested an RFID tattoo on cows, mice and rats, enabling an identifying number embedded under the skin to be read from over a meter away.

Cows, mice and rats today. Humans tomorrow?

Update: Slashdot has picked up the story...

The end of roaming charges? Español | Deutsch | Français | Italiano | Português

In a surprise move, the UK network "3" has ditched roaming charges for its customers. For those of us who spend half our lives in airports, and you have to hope that the rest of the networks follow suit.

But if not, then depending who gets the iPhone when it ships in the UK, then switching networks is starting to look attractive. This despite the fact that I've been with Orange for the last twelve years and am otherwise perfectly happy with them. So if anyone out there in network land is listening, then yes if you're in any doubt, this is a big deal...

A big "no" to mobile TV? Español | Deutsch | Français | Italiano | Português

Apparently the new Virgin mobile TV service released last February isn't proving to be particularly popular, with less than 10,000 subscribers. This really doesn't surprise me, I've never been able to figure out why people would want TV on their mobile phone, despite the industry thinking it was the next killer application to drive traffic over their networks. Remember pocket TVs? I have to shamefully admit to owning one of these little devices sometime in the late 80's, and it was totally useless. While technology has changed a lot, I can't see twenty years having changed how humans behave all that much. Mobile TV isn't a killer application, unless what its supposed to kill is the networks.

The iPhone trademark Español | Deutsch | Français | Italiano | Português

When the Apple iPhone was released on Tuesday I'm sure I wasn't the only person confused about the trademark problems this was going to cause with respect to the already released Linksys iPhone.

CREDIT: Engadget.com

An Apple iPhone at last...

It quickly became clear that there wasn't an agreement in place between the two firms, but that they had been talking about the issue. However it now appears that Cisco is suing Apple over the trademark infringement, and in an unusual move Mark Chandler, Cisco's SVP and General Counsel, has posted an article on the Cisco blog concerning the suit.

You know what, despite thinking the Apple's iPhone is one of the coolest pieces of hardware I've seen in a number of years, I agree with Scoble, this is going to be a real problem for Apple. What was Apple thinking here?

I think they're counting on trademark dilution, all of that media coverage talking about the Apple iPhone which has been going on for years, without any cease and desist orders from Cisco. Maybe they believe they can sell a judge that Cisco hasn't effectively defended the trademark?

Update: According to the BBC, Apple has responded to the suit, saying that,

We think Cisco's trademark lawsuit is silly...There are already several companies using the name iPhone for VOIP products. We are the first company to ever use the iPhone name for a cell phone, and if Cisco wants to challenge us on it we are very confident we will prevail.

which is a pretty strongly worded response, all things considered?

Update: The Register is reporting that the Cisco trademark is now under threat in both Europe and the States.